Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.9:1) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Tekota?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
