Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Shimano Tiagra 80WAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, while Shimano Tiagra 80WAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
