Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
