Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
