Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
