Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX
