Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (160g / 5,64oz) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
