Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
