Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
