Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
