Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
