Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Mitchell 300 4000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 3000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-300
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €673.66
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Mitchell 300, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1428054
Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €45.50
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Mitchell 300 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Mitchell 300 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Mitchell 300?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Mitchell 300 4000X

  • Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency