Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Mitchell 300 4000X
