Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
