Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
