Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
