Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
