Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
