Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
