Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 4000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-401
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €655.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano Sahara FJ, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SH2500FJ
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €63.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.5 out of 10) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

  • Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency