Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 4000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-401
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €655.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano Sedona FJ, C3000HGFJ, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SEC3000HGFJ
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX

  • The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues