Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
