Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
