Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
