Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
