Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €729.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size5000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.8:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.