Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight635g / 22.4oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa BG MQ?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
