Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
