Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight269g / 9.49oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
