Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
