Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
