Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
