Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
59.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight289g / 10.19oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXTREK 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin IXTREK?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin IXTREK 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
