Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
