Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT, PC 2500D-H, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-251
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €661.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizePC 2500D-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sedona FJ, 2500HGFJ, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SE2500HGFJ
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500HGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX

  • The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues