Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
