Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
