Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
