Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
