Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X and Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X offers a weight of 180g / 6,35oz, while Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
