Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and total score (6.35 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Solid value at €89.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
