Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
