Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X