Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
