Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
