Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
