Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
