Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
