Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
