Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
