Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

72.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.73 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT

Spinning

85.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.69 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €89.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (7.69 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.